高级检索

泽布替尼联合BR方案治疗B细胞慢性淋巴增殖性疾病的效果及安全性

The efficacy and safety of zanubrutinib combined with BR regimen in B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorder

  • 摘要:
    目的 探讨泽布替尼联合方案一线治疗B细胞慢性淋巴增殖性疾病(B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorder, B-CLPD)的效果与安全性。
    方法 回顾性分析2021年1月至2025年1月在复旦大学附属中山医院厦门医院血液科初诊及接受治疗的26例 B-CLPD患者的临床资料,疾病类型包括惰性B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤(indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, B-iNHL)、套细胞淋巴瘤(mantle cell lymphoma, MCL)及其他不能分类的B-CLPD。依据治疗方案将患者分为BR(苯达莫司汀联合利妥昔单抗)组和ZBR(泽布替尼联合BR方案)组,比较两组患者基线资料、疗效及治疗相关不良事件(treatment-related adverse event, TRAE)发生率。
    结果 两组患者基线特征差异无统计学意义。所有患者均接受至少4周期治疗,BR组和ZBR组间部分缓解率(46.2% vs 53.8%)、完全缓解率(53.8% vs 15.4%)、总缓解率(100.0% vs 84.6%)和TRAE发生率差异均无统计学意义。接受1个周期治疗后,ZBR组淋巴细胞计数高于BR组(P=0.002);两组间余各治疗周期血液学指标差异均无统计学意义。
    结论 针对B-iNHL、MCL及其他不能分类的B-CLPD患者,ZBR方案与BR方案的治疗安全性和缓解率无明显差异,可进一步研究有限疗程ZBR方案一线治疗惰性淋巴瘤的临床价值。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To explore the efficacy and safety of a zanubrutinib-based combination regimen as first-line treatment for patients with B-cell chronic lymphoproliferative disorder (B-CLPD).
    Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on 26 patients with B-CLPD, including indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-iNHL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and other unclassifiable B-CLPD, who were newly diagnosed and treated at the Department of Hematology, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University between January 2021 and January 2025. Patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment regimen: BR (bendamustine plus rituximab) and ZBR (zanubrutinib combined with BR regimen). Baseline characteristics, treatment responses, and the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were compared between the two groups.
    Results No statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics were observed between the two groups. All patients completed at least four cycles of treatment. There were no significant differences between the BR and ZBR groups in partial response rate (46.2% vs 53.8%), complete response rate (53.8% vs 15.4%), overall response rate (100.0% vs 84.6%), or TRAE incidence. After the first cycle, the lymphocyte count was higher in the ZBR group than in the BR group (P=0.002); no other statistically significant differences in other hematologic parameters were observed at any treatment cycle.
    Conclusions In patients with B-iNHL, MCL, and other unclassifiable B-CLPD, the ZBR regimen demonstrates similar safety and response rates to the BR regimen. These findings support further investigation into the clinical value of ZBR as first-line treatment regimen in a limited course for indolent lymphoid malignancies.

     

/

返回文章
返回