高级检索

TCIC-001用于结肠镜前肠道准备的有效性和耐受性:一项探索性随机对照临床试验

Evaluation of efficacy and tolerability of TCIC-001 for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy: an exploratory randomized controlled clinical trial

  • 摘要:
    目的 比较新型清肠剂TCIC-001与传统聚乙二醇(polyethylene glycol,PEG)电解质散方案在结肠镜检查前肠道准备中的有效性和耐受性。
    方法 前瞻性纳入2021年7月至2022年7月在复旦大学附属中山医院拟行结肠镜检查者62例,采用随机数字表法分为TCIC-001组(n=31)和PEG组(n=31)。TCIC-001组口服TCIC-001,分阶段饮水,总入液量1 500 mL;PEG组口服PEG,分4次服药,总入液量3 000 mL。主要终点指标为采用波士顿评分评估的肠道清洁质量,次要终点指标为服药依从性、服药时长、排便次数、排便时长、不良事件发生率等。
    结果 两组受试者性别、年龄及排便次数差异无统计学意义。有效性方面,两组受试者各肠段波士顿评分和总分差异均无统计学意义,肠道准备良好率均为93.55%。耐受性方面,TCIC-001组较PEG组服药时长更短(48.8±25.9)min vs(82.8±28.4)min,P<0.001、排便时长更久(288.6±74.0)min vs(236.5±74.3)min,P<0.001,首次排便早于服药完成的发生率更低(9.68% vs 41.94%,P=0.004)。安全性方面,TCIC-001组和PEG组氯离子紊乱(0 vs 9.68%)及钙离子紊乱发生率(3.23% vs 6.45%)差异均无统计学意义,且均无其他不良事件。
    结论 TCIC-001在维持与PEG相当的肠道清洁效果基础上,显著缩短服药时长并提高耐受性,且安全性良好。

     

    Abstract:
    Objective To compare the efficacy and tolerability of the novel bowel-cleansing agent TCIC-001 and the traditional polyethylene glycol (PEG) regimen for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy.
    Methods Prospective inclusion of 62 patients who were scheduled to undergo colonoscopy at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University from July 2021 to July 2022. They were randomly divided into TCIC-001 group (n=31) and PEG group (n=31) using a random number table method. The TCIC-001 group took TCIC-001 orally, drinking water in stages, with a total liquid intake of 1 500 mL; the PEG group took PEG orally, taking it in 4 doses, with a total liquid intake of 3 000 mL. The primary endpoint indicator is the quality of intestinal hygiene evaluated by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS), the secondary endpoint indicators were medication adherence, medication duration, frequency of bowel movements, duration of bowel movements, and incidence of adverse events between two groups.
    Results No significant differences were observed in sex, age, or defecation frequency between the two groups. For efficacy, both groups achieved equivalent bowel cleanliness, with a “good preparation” rate of 93.55% and comparable BBPS score of each intestinal segment and total scores. For tolerability, the TCIC-001 group had a shorter medication duration compared to the PEG group (48.8±25.9 min vs 82.8±28.4 min, P<0.001), a longer defecation duration (288.6±74.0 min vs 236.5±74.3 min, P<0.001), and a lower incidence of first defecation before medication completion (9.68% vs 41.94%, P=0.004). Regarding safety, no significant differences were observed between the TCIC-001 group and the PEG group in incidences of chloride disturbances (0% vs 9.68%) and calcium disturbances (3.23% vs 6.45%), and no other adverse events.
    Conclusions TCIC-001 demonstrated comparable bowel-cleansing efficacy to PEG while significantly improving tolerability (reduced medication time and lower risk of premature defecation) and maintaining favorable safety.

     

/

返回文章
返回